KingKong 90GT micro brushless FPV quadcopter
KingKong 90GT - Palm sized brushless quad with FPV camera
The KingKong 90GT drone was announced in PNP package. This means that you will need...
KingKong Tiny7 review: Tiny Whoop for less
Till I get the genuine one, I thought I would review the King Kong Tiny 7. As you can see in the image above,...
KingKong 130GT FPV min racer quad
KingKong 130GT with 800TVL FPV camera and F3 PLUS flight controller
This KingKong 130GT is probably currently the smallest racing quadcopter with brushless motors. According to...
Kingkong 95GT micro brushless FPV quad
Frankly based on my good experience with the Tiny7, I was glad to hear that KingKong announces a similar sized micro drone with brushless motors....
LDARC/Kingkong GT7 & GT8: Two micro brushless Whoops
LDARC's (ex KingKong) new Tiny GT series, brings two micro sized brushless Whoops. While LDARC GT7 has 75mm wheelbase, the Kingkong GT8 has 86.7mm. Both drones,...
KINGKONG/LDARC ET MAX 185mm: The Big Brother
Featuring 185mm wheelbase, the LDARC ET MAX is KINGKONG's biggest FPV racing drone with ducted blade protectors. It is probably the largest Whoop compatible...
Kingkong FLYEGG 100 FPV racer
When it comes about indoor flights with brushless quads, even if they are small as this Kingkong FLYEGG 100, I always recommend to use...
LDARC 90GTI & 130GTI small FPV racing drones
LDARC just announced two new compact FPV drones. While the 98mm size LDARC 90GTI is powered by 3S batteries and has XT1105-5000KV motors, the...
Kingkong ET Series ET125 brushed TinyWhoop
Kingkong, my favorite TinyWhoop alternative manufacturer, announced a new brushed family with 3 different sized drones called ET Series. All 3 versions (ET125, ET115...
LDARC ET75 & ET85 HD/FPV micro racing drones
While many racing quad manufactures already gave up to the Whoop protectors, LDARC just announced two new FPV drones which adopts ducted design. While...
Kingkong ET125 review: Best brushless Whoop?
As I just read that KingKong plans to change its brand name into "LDARC", I should probably name this article "LDARC ET125 review" instead...